AI Strategy · BraivIQ AI Blog
FCA Rule Review: What The Regulator's Simplification Drive Means For Firms Adopting AI
The FCA rule review is changing what firms have to do, not only adding new rules. In a blog on 5 November 2026 the FCA set out how it reviews its rules, pointing to the first phase of SM&CR reforms completed in 2026 and transaction reporting changes announced in August that it expects to save firms more than £100m a year. For firms adopting AI, simpler rules do not mean weaker evidence. They mean the records of what your people and your tools did carry more weight.
Published · Updated · 7 min read · By BraivIQ Editorial
Key takeaways
- The FCA explained on 5 November 2026 that it regularly reviews its rules, using evidence assessments, post-implementation reviews and impact evaluations.
- It said it completed the first phase of SM&CR reforms in 2026, with a second phase possible once new legislation is finalised.
- It pointed to transaction reporting changes announced in August 2026, expected to save firms more than £100m a year.
- Simpler rules shift the weight onto a firm's own records of who did what and why, including work prepared by AI tools.
An FCA rule review is the regulator checking whether its existing rules still work, and updating, simplifying or removing them where they do not. The FCA's blog of 5 November 2026 set out how it does this and listed recent changes. For firms adopting AI, the message is that the FCA is looking at outcomes and evidence rather than paperwork, which puts the quality of your own records in focus.
What did the FCA say on 5 November?
The FCA said markets, consumer behaviour and technology change, so rules that were right when introduced may need to be updated, simplified or removed. It reviews rules under its Rule Review Framework using evidence assessments, post-implementation reviews and impact evaluations, and also learns through supervision, data monitoring, market studies and calls for evidence.
- **SM&CR.** The FCA said it completed the first phase of reforms to the Senior Managers and Certification Regime in 2026, with broader reforms possible once new legislation is finalised.
- **Transaction reporting.** It pointed to changes announced in August 2026 that reduce reporting fields and remove some obligations, expected to save firms more than £100m a year.
- **Moving rules into the Handbook.** As more rules move into the FCA Handbook, it is revisiting requirements and looking at where it can rely less on prescriptive rules.
The blog also listed recent evaluations, including of the 2019 overdrafts intervention and the 2020 ban on contingent charging in pensions, and said an evaluation of the 2018 persistent debt interventions is in progress and will be published soon. Formal reviews are only one source. The FCA said it also learns through supervision, data monitoring, market studies and calls for evidence, so what firms tell it can shape later changes.
What does the FCA rule review mean for firms adopting AI?
Fewer prescriptive rules mean more judgement, and judgement needs evidence. If a firm uses an AI tool to prepare a reconciliation or a report, the question a supervisor asks is the same as for any process: who decided, on what evidence, and can you show it? Our article on SM&CR reform covers the accountability side.
- **Track rule changes.** Keep a list of FCA changes that affect your processes, with the date each takes effect.
- **Keep sign-off records.** Who approved what, when and with what evidence.
- **Measure outcomes.** Errors, rework and time saved, recorded month by month.
| Change | What it means for firms | Record worth keeping |
|---|---|---|
| SM&CR reform, first phase completed in 2026 | Clear senior manager responsibilities | Who owns each process, including AI-assisted work |
| Transaction reporting changes, August 2026 | Fewer reporting fields and some obligations removed | Which fields changed and when your reports were updated |
| Rules moving into the FCA Handbook | Less reliance on prescriptive rules | How your firm meets the outcome, with evidence |
How can automation help with regulatory change?
Reading regulator publications, matching them to your policies and noting deadlines is preparation work. In our Desk Twin, the /reg shortcut prepares a digest of new publications with links for a person to review. Our transaction report checks workflow does the same for reports: the agent compares and explains, and a person approves every correction and the submission. Our earlier article on regulatory reporting automation covers the August changes.
Where should a firm start?
List the FCA changes from the last six months that touch your processes, and check that each one has an owner and a date. A 14-day Proof Run can show which parts of that tracking can be prepared automatically. This article summarises an FCA publication and is not regulatory advice.
Frequently asked questions
What is the FCA rule review?
It is how the FCA checks whether its rules are working as intended and updates, simplifies or removes them where needed, using evidence assessments, post-implementation reviews and impact evaluations.
What has the FCA simplified recently?
In its blog of 5 November 2026 the FCA pointed to the first phase of SM&CR reforms completed in 2026 and transaction reporting changes announced in August 2026, expected to save firms more than £100m a year.
Do simpler rules mean less evidence for firms using AI?
No. Fewer prescriptive rules put more weight on a firm's own records of who decided what, on what evidence, including work prepared by AI tools.
Which past FCA interventions are being evaluated?
The FCA said on 5 November 2026 that it is progressing an evaluation of its 2018 persistent debt interventions and will publish it soon, following evaluations that include its 2019 overdrafts intervention and the 2020 ban on contingent charging in pensions.
References
- Financial Conduct Authority, "Looking back to move forward: why reviewing our rules matters", 5 November 2026. https://www.fca.org.uk/news/blogs/looking-back-move-forward-why-reviewing-our-rules-matters